Welcome

A WORLD OF SCIENTESTS & THEIR INVENTIONS
ENTER

Add An Entry Or A Welcome Page To Blogger by Beautiful Blogger Widgets

A WORLD OF SCIENTISTS AND THEIR INVENTIONS

Welcome

On this blog you'll access to important information related to scientists and their contribution in the field of Biological science as well as other fields of Science. I hope this blog helpful for every person who looking for study or research in Science.
Thanks for visit my blog
Sunday, 30 September 2012

Joseph Lister

Joseph Lister (5 April 1827 – 10 February 1912) was a British surgeon and a pioneer of antiseptic surgery, who promoted the idea of sterile surgery while working at the Glasgow Royal Infirmary. Lister successfully introduced carbolic acid (now known as phenol) to sterilise surgical instruments and to clean wounds, which led to a reduction in post-operative infections and made surgery safer for patients.
Lister was interested in surgery from an early stage - he was present at the first surgical procedure carried out under anaesthetic in 1846. Lister continued his studies in London and passed his examinations, becoming a fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons in 1852. He was recommended to visit Professor of Clinical Surgery James Syme (1799-1870) in Edinburgh and became his dresser, then house surgeon and then his son-in-law.
Lister moved to Glasgow in 1860 and became a Professor of Surgery. He read Pasteur's work on micro-organisms and decided to experiment with using one of Pasteur's proposed techniques, that of exposing the wound to chemicals. He chose dressings soaked with carbolic acid (phenol) to cover the wound and the rate of infection was vastly reduced. Lister then experimented with hand-washing, sterilising instruments and spraying carbolic in the theatre while operating, in order to limit infection. His lowered infection rate was very good and Listerian principles were adopted throughout many countries by a number of surgeons. Lister is now known as the ‘father of antiseptic.
Saturday, 29 September 2012

Robert Koch

Robert Koch is considered to be one of the founders of the field of bacteriology. He pioneered principles and techniques in studying bacteria and discovered the specific agents that cause tuberculosis, cholera, and anthrax. For this he is also regarded as a founder of public health, aiding legislation and changing prevailing attitudes about hygiene to prevent the spread of various infectious diseases. For his work on tuberculosis,he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1905.
While in Berlin, Koch became interested in tuberculosis, which he wasconvinced was infectious, and, therefore, caused by a bacterium. Several scientists had made similar claims but none had been verified. Many other scientists persisted in believing that tuberculosis was an inherited disease. In sixmonths, Koch succeeded in isolating a bacillus from tissues of humans and animals infected with tuberculosis. In 1882, he published a paper declaring that this bacillus met his four conditions--that is, it was isolated from diseased animals, it was grown in a pure culture, it was transferred to a healthy animal who then developed the disease, and it was isolated from the animal infected by the cultured organism. When he presented his findings before the Physiological Society in Berlin on March 24, he held the audience spellbound, sological and thorough was his delivery of this important finding. This day has come to be known as the day modern bacteriology was born.
Koch determined guidelines to prove that a disease is caused by a specific organism. These four basic criteria, called Koch’s postulates, are:
1.       A specific microorganism is always associated with a given disease.
2.       The microorganism can be isolated from the diseased animal and grown in pure culture in the laboratory.
3.       The cultured microbe will cause disease when transferred to a healthy animal.
4.       The same type of microorganism can be isolated from the newly infected animal.

Stanley Lloyd Miller

Stanley Lloyd Miller born in Oakland, California (March 7, 1930) an American chemist and biologist who is known for his studies into the origin of life, particularly the Miller–Urey experiment which demonstrated that organic compounds can be created by fairly simple physical processes from inorganic substances. However, it has since been demonstrated that the conditions used for the experiment may not have been an accurate representation of the early Earth atmosphere.
He studied at University of California at Berkeley (earning his B.Sc. in 1951) and then at University of Chicago where he earned his Ph.D. in chemistry in 1954. While at Chicago, Miller was a student of Harold Urey.

Robert W. Holley

Robert W. HolleyHolley, Robert William, 1922-93, American biochemist, b. Urbana, Ill., Ph.D. Cornell, 1947. He was a professor at Cornell (1948-68) before he joined (1968) the Salk Institute, and he continued an association with Cornell after 1968. Holley received the 1968 Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine jointly with Har Gobind Khorana and Marshall W. Nirenberg for their interpretation of the genetic code and its function in protein synthesis. Holley is credited with isolating transfer RNA (tRNA) and then determining the sequence and structure of alanine tRNA, which incorporates the amino acid alanine into proteins. Knowledge of the structure of tRNA was key to explaining how proteins are synthesized from messenger RNA.

Antony van Leeuwenhoek


Anton van Leeuwenhoek was a linen merchant in Delft, the Netherlands, whose passion for science helped make him one of the most important figures in the history of microbiology.
Van Leeuwenhoek saw his first microscope, in use in the fabric trade, in 1653, and he soon bought one of his own. He read Robert Hooke's Micrographia, and it reportedly enthralled him.
By 1668, he was grinding lenses for his own simple microscopes and looking at every tiny thing he could find. Those two things — his boundless curiosity and the fact that he kept improving his lenses were critical to his discoveries.
Van Leeuwenhoek was the first to identify microorganisms, notably protists and bacteria, and the first to describe red blood cells and sperm.
Van Leeuwenhoek's discoveries were documented in letters he wrote to Henry Oldenburg, secretary of the Royal Society of London, between 1673 and Van Leeuwenhoek's death in 1723. The letters made him famous, and the Royal Society made him a fellow in 1680.

Edward Jenner


Edward Jenner.Edward Jenner was born in 1749, in Berkeley. He wanted to get rid of small pox for ever so he carried out a simple experiment, which turned out to change everyone's lives for the better.
Edward Jenner noticed that cows sometimes got a disease called cowpox. Because the milkmaids had to milk the cows, they often also caught cowpox…but it didn't seem to harm them. Edward Jenner was intrigued - milkmaids that had caught cowpox never seemed to catch the contagious and deadly smallpox, which thousands of people died from. Edward Jenner came up with a theory, that cowpox prevented people from getting smallpox. To test his theory, Edward Jenner needed to find someone who was young and who hadn't caught smallpox or cowpox before. He found a boy called James Phipps (aged 8) and explained his idea. Edward Jenner then took some pus from a milkmaid's cowpox and rubbed it into two small incisions on James's arm. Soon after, James became ill with cowpox but the symptoms didn't last long. 6 weeks later, Jenner took some pus from a smallpox victim and again put it into James's cuts. However, this time James didn't catch the disease. Cowpox was called vaccinia so he called his invention the vaccine.

Craig Venter

John Craig Venter (born October 14, 1946) is an American biologist and entrepreneur. He is known for being one of the first to sequence the human genome and for creating the first cell with a synthetic genome. Venter founded Celera Genomics, The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) and the J. Craig Venter Institute (JCVI), and is now working at JCVI to create synthetic biological organisms. In  1984, he moved to the National Institutes of Health campus where he  developed Expressed Sequence Tags or ESTs, a revolutionary new strategy  for rapid gene discovery. Using ESTs he and his team discovered thousands  of new human genes while at NIH. In 1992 Dr. Venter founded The Institute  for Genomic Research (TIGR), a not-for-profit research institute, where in  1995 he and his team decoded the genome of the first free-living organism,  the bacterium Haemophilus influenzae, using his new whole genome shotgun  technique. This led to the rapid  and accurate decoding of hundreds of  important genomes including human viral and bacterial pathogens,  environmental microbes, insect, plant and mammalian genomes.  In 1998, Dr. Venter founded Celera Genomics to sequence the human  genome using new tools and  techniques he and his  team developed. This  research culminated with the February 2001 publication of the human genome  in the journal,  Science. He and his team at Celera also sequenced the fruit  fly, mouse and rat genomes.

Kary Mullis


Kary Banks Mullis, Nobel Prize winning chemist, was born on December 28, 1944, in Lenoir, North Carolina.
He received a Bachelor of Science degree in chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1966. He earned a Ph.D. degree in biochemistry from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1972 and lectured in biochemistry there until 1973. That year, Kary became a postdoctoral fellow in pediatric cardiology at the University of Kansas Medical School, with emphasis in the areas of angiotensin and pulmonary vascular physiology. In 1977 he began two years of postdoctoral work in pharmaceutical chemistry at the University of California, San Francisco.
Kary joined the Cetus Corporation in Emeryville, California, as a DNA chemist in 1979. During his seven years there, he conducted research on oligonucleotide synthesis and invented the polymerase chain reaction.
Kary received a Nobel Prize in chemistry in 1993, for his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The process, which Kary conceptualized in 1983, is hailed as one of the monumental scientific techniques of the twentieth century.
A method of amplifying DNA, PCR multiplies a single, microscopic strand of the genetic material billions of times within hours. The process has multiple applications in medicine, genetics, biotechnology, and forensics. PCR, because of its ability to extract DNA from fossils, is in reality the basis of a new scientific discipline, paleobiology.
Kary has authored several major patents. His patented inventions include the PCR technology and UV-sensitive plastic that changes color in response to light. His most recent patent application covers a revolutionary approach to instantly mobilize the immune system to neutralize invading pathogens and toxins, leading to the formation of his latest venture, Altermune LLC. Altermune is currently focusing on Influenza A and drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Arthur Kornberg

Arthur KornbergArthur Kornberg (March 3, 1918 – October 26, 2007) was an American biochemist who won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1959 for his discovery of "the mechanisms in the biological synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)" together with Dr. Severo Ochoa of New York University. In 1953, he became Professor and Head of the Department of Microbiology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, until 1959. There he continued experimenting with the enzymes that created DNA. In 1958, Kornberg isolated the first DNA polymerising enzyme, now known as DNA polymerase I.
His primary research interests were in biochemistry, especially enzyme chemistry, deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis (DNA replication) and studying the nucleic acids which control heredity in animals, plants, bacteria and viruses.

Har Gobind Khorana

H. Gobind KhoranaDr. Hargobind Khorana was born on 9th January 1922 at Raipur, Punjab (now in Pakistan). Dr.Khorana was responsible for producing the first man-made gene in his laboratory in the early seventies. This historic invention won him the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1968 sharing it with M.W. Nuremberg and R.W. Holley for interpreting the genetic code and analyzing its function in protein synthesis.
They all independently made contributions to the understanding of the genetic code and how it works in the cell. Khorana, born into a poor family attended D.A.V. High School in Multan, took his M.Sc from Punjab University at Lahore and in 1945 he went to England on a government scholarship and obtained a PhD from the University of Liverpool (1948). Dr. Khorana spent a year in Zurich in 1948-49 as a post-doctoral fellow at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and returned to India for a brief period in 1949. He returned to England in 1950 and spent two years on a fellowship at Cambridge and began research on nucleic acids under Sir Alexander Todd and Kenner. His interest in proteins and nucleic acids took root at that time. In 1952 he went to the University of British Columbia, Vancouver on a job offer and there a group began to work in the field of biologically interesting phosphate esters and nucleic acids with the inspiration from Dr. Gordon M. Shrum and Scientific counsel from Dr. Jack Campbell. In 1960 he joined the University of Wisconsin as Professor and co-Director of the Institute of Enzyme Research and Professor of Biochemistry (1962-70) and became an US citizen. Khorana continued research on nucleic acid synthesis and prepared the first artificial copy of a yeast gene. Dr. Khorana is also the first to synthesize oligonucleotides, that is, strings of nucleotides. These custom designed pieces of artificial genes are widely used in biology labs for sequencing, cloning and engineering new plants and animals. The oligo nucleotides, thus, have become indispensable tools in biotechnology.
Friday, 28 September 2012

Louis Pasteur


Louis Pasteur was a world renowned French chemist and biologist. He was born on December 27 1822 in the town of Dole in Eastern France.
In 1847 Pasteur was awarded his doctorate and then took up a post as assistant to one of his teachers. He spent several years teaching and carrying out research at Dijon and Strasbourg and in 1854 moved to the University of Lille where he became professor of chemistry. Here he continued the work on fermentation he had already started at Strasbourg. By 1857 Pasteur had become world famous and took up a post at the Ecole Normale Superieure in Paris. In 1863 he became dean of the new science faculty at Lille University. While there, he started evening classes for workers. In 1867 a laboratory was established for his discovery of the rabies vaccine, using public funds. It became known as the Pasteur Institute and was headed by Pasteur until his death in 1895.
Pasteur founded the science of microbiology and proved that most infectious diseases are caused by micro-organisms. This became known as the "germ theory" of disease. He was the inventor of the process of pasteurisation and also developed vaccines for several diseases including rabies. The discovery of the vaccine for rabies led to the founding of the Pasteur Institute in Paris in 1888.

Stephen Hawking


Stephen William Hawking (born 8 January 1942) is a British theoretical physicist and author. His significant scientific works to date have been collaboration with Roger Penrose on theorems on gravitational singularities in the framework of general relativity, and the theoretical prediction that black holes should emit radiation, often called Hawking radiation.
He is an Honorary Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts, a lifetime member of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, and a recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian award in the United States. Hawking was the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge between 1979 and 2009. Subsequently, he became research director at the university's Centre for Theoretical Cosmology.
Hawking has achieved success with works of popular science in which he discusses his own theories and cosmology in general; his A Brief History of Time stayed on the British Sunday Times best-sellers list for a record-breaking 237 weeks. Hawking has a motor neurone disease related to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a condition that has progressed over the years. He is now almost entirely paralysed and communicates through a speech generating device.

Werner Arber

Werner ArberSwiss microbiologist Werner Arber was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine or Physiology in 1978, sharing the $165,000 award with Daniel Nathans and Hamilton O. Smith. Observing that when a virus entered bacterium, most of the viral deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was destroyed, Arber theorized that the bacterium produced an enzyme that severed the viral DNA into smaller pieces. Nathans and Smith later proved that Arber was correct -- that certain enzymes, called 'restriction enzyme' or 'restriction endonuclease', cleave long strands of DNA into tiny fragments. These fragments, which retain their genetic information, led to the development of gene splicing -- techniques for separating, manipulating, and eventually altering this basic genetic material.
After winning his Nobel honors, Arber became an outspoken participant in the establishment of guidelines to conduct recombinant DNA research safely and ethically. His daughter, Silvia Arber, is a professor of neurobiology at the University of Basel, studying neuronal circuit formation in the developing spinal cord.

Phillip A. Sharp

Phillip_SharpPhillip Allen Sharp is an American geneticist and molecular biologist. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1993 for his discovery of RNA splicing, the technique of modifying the RNA. He shared the prize with Richard J. Roberts. Sharp discovered that genes in eukaryotes are not contiguous strings but they contain introns. The messenger RNA can be spliced to delete these introns and different proteins can be obtained from the same sequence of DNA.
Phillip Sharp is also an accomplished businessman and is the co-founder of 3 successful companies Biogen, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and Magen Biosciences. Sharp was awarded the Dickson Prize 1980, Lasker Award 1988, Benjamin Franklin Medal by the American Philosophical Society 1999 and the National Medal of Science 2004.

Frederick Sanger


Frederick SangerFrederick Sanger is an English Biochemist and two time Nobel Laureate in Chemistry. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1958 for his work on the structure of proteins (especially insulin) and in 1980 he shared the Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Walter Gilbert and Paul Berg. Gilbert and Sanger shared half of the prize for their breakthrough in the determination of nucleic acid base sequence.
Frederick Sanger proved that proteins have a defined chemical composition. He successfully determined the complete amino acid sequence of two polypeptide chains of Bovine Insulin. Sanger developed “dideoxy “chain termination method for sequencing DNA molecule. This method was used to sequence human mitochondrial DNA, bacteriophage DNA and eventually entire human genome.
Thursday, 27 September 2012

Matthew Paul Berg

Paul Berg

Molecular biologist who in 1972 created the first recombinant DNA molecules, and, in doing so, created the field of genetic engineering.
Berg, in 1972, combined DNA from the cancer-causing monkey virus SV40 with that of the virus lambda to create the first recombinant DNA molecules. However, upon realizing the dangers of his experiment, terminated it before it could be taken any further. He immediately, in what is now called the "Berg Letter," proposed a one year moratorium on recombinant DNA research, in order for safety concerns to be worked out. Berg made one of the most fundamental technical contributions to the field of genetics in the twentieth century: he developed a technique for splicing together deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) the substance that carries the genetic information in living cells and viruses from generation to generation--from different types of organisms. His achievement gave scientists a priceless tool for studying the structure of viral chromosomes and the biochemical basis of human genetic diseases. It also let researchers turn simple organisms into chemical factories that churn out valuable medical drugs. In 1980 he was awarded the Nobel Prize in chemistry for pioneering this procedure, now referred to as recombinant DNA technology (RDT).
In 1991, Berg accepted a position as the head of the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Human Genome Project.
Monday, 10 September 2012

Friedrich Miescher

Friedrich (Fritz) Miescher was born in Basel, Switzerland. The Miescher family was well-respected and part of the intellectual elite in Basel. Friedrich's father was a physician and taught pathological anatomy; Friedrich's uncle, Wilhelm His, was a well-known embryologist.
Miescher was an excellent student despite his shyness and a hearing handicap. Miescher initially wanted to be a priest, but his father opposed the idea and Miescher entered medical school. When he graduated in 1868, Miescher ruled out specialties where patient interactions were necessary because of his hearing problem. He decided to base his career on medical research. He went to the University of Tübingen to study under Felix Hoppe-Seyler in the newly established faculty of natural science.
Hoppe-Seyler's laboratory was one of the first in Germany to focus on tissue chemistry. At a time when scientists were still debating the concept of "cell," Hoppe-Seyler and his lab were isolating the molecules that made up cells. Miescher was given the task of researching the composition of lymphoid cells — white blood cells.
These cells were difficult to extract from the lymph glands, but they were found in great quantities in the pus from infections. Miescher collected bandages from a nearby clinic and washed off the pus. He experimented and isolated a new molecule - nuclein - from the cell nucleus. He determined that nuclein was made up of hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and phosphorus and there was an unique ratio of phosphorus to nitrogen. He was able to isolate nuclein from other cells and later used salmon sperm (as opposed to pus) as a source.
Although Miescher did most of his work in 1869, his paper on nuclein wasn't published until 1871. Nuclein was such a unique molecule that Hoppe-Seyler was skeptical and wanted to confirm Miescher's results before publication.
Miescher continued to work on nuclein for the rest of his career. He also examined the metabolic changes that occur in salmon when they spawn. In 1872, Miescher was appointed the professor of physiology at the University of Basel, a position previously held by his father and then his uncle. The appointment meant more funds and equipment for research, but it also meant that Miescher had to teach. Although he put in a lot of time and effort, Miescher was not a good teacher. His shyness and preoccupation with his research made it difficult for him to relate to his students. He was a perfectionist and a workaholic, and often worked very long hours to do the nuclein isolations.
It would be years before the role of nucleic acids were recognized. Miescher, himself, believed that proteins were the molecules of heredity. However, Miescher laid the groundwork for the molecular discoveries that followed. Miescher died in 1895 from tuberculosis.

Isolating Hereditary Material: Frederick Griffith, Oswald Avery, Alfred Hershey, and Martha Chase


In the first half of the twentieth century, Gregor Mendel's principles of genetic inheritance became widely accepted, but the chemical nature of the hereditary material remained unknown. Scientists did know that genes were located on chromosomes and that chromosomes consisted of DNA and proteins. At the time, however, proteins seemed to be a better choice for the genetic material, because chemical analyses had shown that proteins are more varied than DNA in their chemical composition, as well as in their physical properties. Therefore, the eventual identification of DNA as the hereditary material came as a surprise to scientists. This breakthrough resulted from a series of experiments with bacteria and bacteriophages, or viruses that infect bacteria. Together, these experiments demonstrated that DNA was transferred between generations and that this molecule had the ability to transform the properties of a cell.


Frederick Griffith Discovers Bacterial Transformation
In the aftermath of the deadly 1918 flu epidemic, governments across the globe rushed to develop vaccines that could stop the spread of infectious diseases. In England, microbiologist Frederick Griffith was studying two strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae that varied dramatically in both their appearance and their virulence, or their ability to cause disease. Specifically, the highly virulent S strain had a smooth capsule, or outer coat composed of polysaccharides, while the nonvirulent R strain had a rough appearance and lacked a capsule (Figure 1). Mice injected with the S strain died within a few days after injection, while mice injected with the R strain did not die.
Through a series of experiments, Griffith established that the virulence of the S strain was destroyed by heating the bacteria. Thus, he was surprised to find that mice died when they were injected with a mixture of heat-killed Sbacteria and living R bacteria, neither of which caused mice to die when they were injected alone. Griffith was able to isolate live bacteria from the hearts of the dead animals that had been injected with the mixed strains, and he observed that these bacteria had the smooth capsules characteristic of the S strain. Based on these observations, Griffith hypothesized that a chemical component from the virulent S cells had somehow transformed the R cells into the more virulent S form (Griffith, 1928). Unfortunately, Griffith was not able to identify the chemical nature of this "transforming principle" beyond the fact that it was able to survive heat treatment.


DNA Is Identified as the “Transforming Principle”


The actual identification of DNA as the "transforming principle" was an unexpected outcome of a series of clinical investigations of pneumococcal infections performed over many years (Steinman & Moberg, 1994). At the same time that Griffith was conducting his experiments, researcher Oswald Avery and his colleagues at the Rockefeller University in New York were performing detailed analyses of the pneumococcal cell capsule and the role of this capsule in infections. Modern antibiotics had not yet been discovered, and Avery was convinced that a detailed understanding of the pneumococcal cell was essential to the effective treatment of bacterial pneumonia. Over the years, Avery's group had accumulated considerable biochemical expertise as they established that strains of pneumococci could be distinguished by the polysaccharides in their capsules and that the integrity of the capsule was essential for virulence. Thus, when Griffith's results were published, Avery and his colleagues recognized the importance of these findings, and they decided to use their expertise to identify the specific molecules that could transform a nonencapsulated bacterium into an encapsulated form. In a significant departure from Griffith's procedure, however, Avery's team employed a method for transforming bacteria in cultures rather than in living mice, which gave them better control of their experiments.
 Avery and his colleagues, including researchers Colin MacLeod and Maclyn McCarty, used a process of elimination to identify the transforming principle (Avery et al., 1944). In their experiments, identical extracts from heat-treated S cells were first treated with hydrolytic enzymes that specifically destroyed protein, RNA, or DNA. After the enzyme treatments, the treated extracts were then mixed with live R cells. Encapsulated S cells appeared in all of the cultures, except those in which the S strain extract had been treated with DNAse, an enzyme that destroys DNA. These results suggested that DNA was the molecule responsible for transformation.
Avery and his colleagues provided further confirmation for this hypothesis by chemically isolating DNA from the cell extract and showing that it possessed the same transforming ability as the heat-treated extract. We now consider these experiments, which were published in 1944, as providing definitive proof that DNA is the hereditary material. However, the team's results were not well received at the time, most likely because popular opinion still favored protein as the hereditary material.


Hershey and Chase Prove Protein Is Not the Hereditary Material


Protein was finally excluded as the hereditary material following a series of experiments published by Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase in 1952. These experiments involved the T2 bacteriophage, a virus that infects the E. coli bacterium. At the time, bacteriophages were widely used as experimental models for studying genetic transmission because they reproduce rapidly and can be easily harvested. In fact, during just one infection cycle, bacteriophages multiply so rapidly within their host bacterial cells that they ultimately cause the cells to burst, thus releasing large numbers of new infectious bacteriophages. The T2 bacteriophage used by Hershey and Chase was known to consist of both protein and DNA, but the role that each substance played in the growth of the bacteriophage was unclear. Electron micrographs had shown that T2 bacteriophages consist of an icosahedral head, a cylindrical sheath, and a base plate that mediates attachment to the bacterium, shown schematically in Figure 5. After infection, phage particles remain attached to the bacterium, but the heads appear empty, forming "ghosts."
To determine the roles that the T2 bacteriophage's DNA and protein play in infection, Hershey and Chase decided to use radioisotopes to trace the fate of the phage's protein and DNA by taking advantage of their chemical differences. Proteins contain sulfur, but DNA does not. Conversely, DNA contains phosphate, but proteins do not. Thus, when infected bacteria are grown in the presence of radioactive forms of phosphate (32P) or sulfur (35S), radioactivity can be selectively incorporated into either DNA or protein. Hershey and Chase employed this method to prepare both 32P-labeled and 35S-labeled bacteriophages, which they then used to infect bacteria. To determine which of the labeled molecules entered the infected bacteria, they detached the phage ghosts from the infected cells by mechanically shearing them off in an ordinary kitchen blender. The ghosts and bacterial cells were then physically separated using a centrifuge. The larger bacterial cells moved rapidly to the bottom of the centrifuge tube, where they formed a pellet. The smaller, lighter phage ghosts remained in the supernatant, where they could be collected and analyzed. During analysis, Hershey and Chase discovered that almost all of the radioactive sulfur remained with the ghosts, while about one-third of the radioactive phosphate entered the bacterial cells and could later be recovered in the next generation of bacteriophages.
From these experiments, Hershey and Chase determined that protein formed a protective coat around the bacteriophage that functioned in both phage attachment to the bacterium and in the injection of phage DNA into the cell. Interestingly, they did not conclude that DNA was the hereditary material, pointing out that further experiments were required to establish the role that DNA played in phage replication. In fact, Hershey and Chase circumspectly ended their paper with the following statement: "This protein probably has no function in the growth of intracellular phage. The DNA has some function. Further chemical inferences should not be drawn from the experiments presented" (Hershey & Chase, 1952). However, a mere one year later, the structure of DNA was determined, and this allowed investigators to put together the pieces in the question of DNA structure and function

Barbara McClintock and the Discovery of Jumping Genes (Transposons)

Barbara McClintockSome of the most profound genetic discoveries have been made with the help of various model organisms that are favored by scientists for their widespread availability and ease of maintenance and proliferation. One such model is Zea mays (maize), particularly those plants that produce variably colored kernels. Because each kernel is an embryo produced from an individual fertilization, hundreds of offspring can be scored on a single ear, making maize an ideal organism for genetic analysis. Indeed, maize proved to be the perfect organism for the study of transposable elements (TEs), also known as "jumping genes" which were discovered during the middle part of the twentieth century by American scientist Barbara McClintock. McClintock's work was revolutionary in that it suggested that an organism's genome is not a stationary entity, but rather it is subject to alteration and rearrangement—a concept that was met with criticism from the scientific community of the time. Eventually, however, the significance of McClintock's work became widely appreciated, and she was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1983.
McClintock and the Origins of Cytogenetics
Barbara McClintock began her scientific career at Cornell University, where she pioneered the study of cytogenetics—a new field in the 1930s—using maize as a model. Indeed, the marriage of cytology and genetics became official in 1931, when McClintock and graduate student Harriet Creighton provided the first experimental proof that genes were physically positioned on chromosomes by describing the crossing-over phenomenon and geneticrecombination. Although Thomas Hunt Morgan was the first person to suggest the link between genetic traits and the exchange of genetic material by chromosomes, 20 years elapsed before his ideas were scientifically proven, largely due to limitations in cytological and experimental techniques (Coe & Kass, 2005). McClintock's own innovative cytogenetic techniques were what allowed her to confirm Morgan's ideas, and these techniques are thus among her greatest contributions to science.
Discovering TEs through Experimentation with Maize
As previously mentioned, McClintock is best known not for her innovations in cytogenetic techniques, but rather for her discovery of transposable elements through experimentation with maize. In order to understand McClintock's observations (and logic) that led to her discovery of TEs, however, it's first necessary to be aware that the phenotypic system that McClintock studied—the variegated color pattern of maize kernels—involved three alleles rather than the usual two. Think of every maize kernel as essentially a single individual, originating as an ovule that undergoes (or has undergone) double fertilization. During double fertilization, one sperm fuses with the egg cell's nucleus, producing a diploid zygote that will develop into the next generation. Meanwhile, the other sperm fuses with the two polar nuclei to form a triploid endosperm. As a result, the colored (or colorless, as the case may be) tissue that makes up the aleurone (or outer) layer of the endosperm is triploid, not diploid.
Variation in kernel phenotypes is used to study transposon behavior.
McClintock worked with what is known as the Ac/Ds system in maize, which she discovered by conducting standard genetic breeding experiments using plants with an unusual phenotype. Through these experiments, McClintock recognized that breakage occurred at specific sites on maize chromosomes. Indeed, the first transposable element she discovered was a site of chromosome breakage, aptly named "dissociation" (Ds). Although McClintock eventually found that some TEs can "jump" autonomously, she noted that the movements of Ds are regulated by an autonomous element called "activator" (Ac), which can also promote its own transposition.
Of course, these discoveries were preceded by extensive breeding experimentation. It was known at the time from previous work by Rollins A. Emerson, another American maize geneticist, that maize had genes encoding variegated, or multicolored, kernels; these kernels were described as colorless (although they were actually white or yellow), except for spots or streaks of purple or brown. Emerson had proposed that the variegated streaking was due to an "unstable mutation," or a mutation for the colorless phenotype that would sometimes revert back to its wild-type variant and result in an area of color. However, he couldn't explain why or how this occurred. As McClintock discovered, the unstable mutation Emerson puzzled over was actually a four-gene system.

The Watson and Crick Structure of DNA

Today, our series on models of DNA is concluded with a discussion of the correct structure determined by James Watson and Francis Crick. Although they made an unlikely pair, the two men succeeded where one of the era’s leading scientists – Linus Pauling – failed, and in the process they unraveled the secrets of what may be the most important molecule in human history.
In the fall of 1951, James Watson was studying microbial metabolism and nucleic acid biochemistry as a postdoctoral fellow in Europe. It didn’t take long for him to tire of these subjects and to begin looking for more inspiring research. He became interested in DNA upon seeing some x-ray photos developed by Maurice Wilkins. He then tried to talk his way into Wilkins’ lab at King’s College, but was denied and ended up studying protein x-ray diffraction in the Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge University. Here he was assigned space in an office to be shared with an older graduate student named Francis Crick, a crystallographer. At the time, Crick was studying under Max Perutz, and was also becoming bored with his research. Watson and Crick hit it off immediately and before long, Watson’s interest in DNA had worn off on Crick. Although neither of them were experts in structural chemistry, they decided to attempt to solve the structure of DNA. As Watson put it, their planned method of attack would be to “imitate Linus Pauling and beat him at his own game.”
The pair’s first attempt at the structure in the fall of 1951 was very quick, and also unsuccessful. Interestingly, however, it was quite similar to Linus Pauling and Robert Corey‘s own attempt about a year later. Watson and Crick came up with a three stranded helix, with the base rings located on the outside of the molecule and the phosphate groups found on the inside. This left them with the problem of fitting so many negatively charged phosphates into the core without the molecule blowing itself apart. In order to solve this problem, they turned to Pauling’s own The Nature of the Chemical Bond. They were looking for positive ions that would fit into the core of DNA, therefore canceling the negative charge. They found magnesium and calcium to be possibilities, but there was no significant evidence that these ions were in DNA. However, there was no evidence against it either, so they ran with the idea.
Watson and Crick assumed – as would Pauling in his later attempt – that the finer details would fall into place. Overjoyed at solving DNA so quickly, they invited Wilkins and his assistant, Rosalind Franklin, to have a look at their structure. Expecting praise, they were undoubtedly surprised when Franklin verbally destroyed their work. She told them that any positive ions found in the core would be surrounded by water, which would render them neutral and unable to cancel out the negative phosphate charges. She also noted that DNA soaks up a large amount of water, which indicates that the phosphate groups are on the outside of the molecule. All in all, Franklin had no positive feedback for Watson and Crick.  And she was, at it turned out, correct. After the visit, Watson and Crick attempted to persuade Wilkins and Franklin to collaborate with them on another attempt at the structure of DNA, but their offer was declined.
 
© Copyright 2010-2011 A All Rights Reserved.
Template Design by Ram Chandra Choudhary | Published by | Powered by Blogger.com.